Pics source: www.knowledgebank.irri.org
One of my PhD students, Le Thi Hong Phuong from Vietnam, just had her review article (with me and Robbert Biesbroek of Wageningen UR as humble co-authors) published in NJAS . In the paper she maintains that successful implementation climate change adaptation depends to a large extent on the capabilities of individuals, organizations, and communities to create and mobilize the adaptive capacity (AC) of their socio-ecological system. In the paper, creating and mobilizing AC is seens as a continuous process that requires social learning (SL). Although rich with empirical cases, the literature theorizing and empirically investigating the relationship between AC and SL is highly fragmented. This paper aims to critically examine the peer-reviewed literature that focusses on SL and AC in the context of climate change adaptation (CCA).
Special attention is paid to the interplay between the two. Understanding this interplay can help improve our understanding of how CCA takes place in practice and advances theoretical debates on CCA. Systematic review methods are used to analyse 43 papers (1997–2016). The findings reveal three perspectives that each play an important role in different contexts: an AC-focused perspective, a SL-focused perspective, and a hybrid perspective. These differences in conceptualizations of the relationship between SL and AC may seem trivial at first, but they have consequences for the design of learning-based interventions aimed at helping communities respond to climate change. It appears that such interventions need to be preceded by an analysis of the climate change context in order to decide whether to emphasize AC, SL or both simultaneously.
You can find the paper here: The interplay between social learning and adaptive capacity in climate change adaptation or request a copy by emailing me at firstname.lastname@example.org The DOI is: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.njas.2017.05.001
- Social learning (SL) & adaptive capacity (AC) are critical in climate change adaptation.
- Social learning does not necessarily build adaptive capacity and vice versa.
- Three interplays between SL and AC emerge: SL-focused, AC-focused and hybrid.
- The effectiveness of an interplay depends on the climate adaptation context.
- This has implications for governance to help communities to adapt to climate change.